Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Poolside: Laguna S 2.1 vs xAI: Grok 4.20

Laguna S 2.1 leads on average score with 4.5 vs 4.1. Laguna S 2.1 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.025 vs $0.057. Grok 4.20 is faster at 1.11s vs 11.67s, with pass rates of 15.2% vs 27.3%.

Recommended modelLaguna S 2.1It has the best score here (4.5), while costing about 2.3x less than Grok 4.20.

Last updated at: 2026-07-22

Metric Laguna S 2.1 Laguna S 2.1 none Release: 2026-07-21 Free Available Grok 4.20 Grok 4.20 none Release: 2026-03-31
Score 4.5 4.1
Rank #200 #207
Reliability 10.0 N/A
Consistency 8.8 8.1
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 15.2% 27.3%
Flaky tests 3 0
Total Runs 66 54
Cost per result 1.205 1.570
Total Cost $0.025 $0.057
Input Price $0.100 / 1M $1.250 / 1M
Output Price $0.200 / 1M $2.500 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 125,598 41,313
Output Tokens 57,634 1,923
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 11.67s 1.11s
Response Time (max) 200.52s 6.04s
Response Time (total) 256.80s 19.96s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#200 Laguna S 2.1

none
Cost
$0.001
Time
7.6s
Tokens
1,345 tok

#207 xAI: Grok 4.20

none
Cost
$0.004
Time
6.5s
Tokens
1,367 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Laguna S 2.1 3.4 9.7 0.0% 0 550ms 7,917 424 0
Grok 4.20 1.1 3.1 0.0% 0 1.22s 1,074 312 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair