Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Kimi K2.5 (medium) vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B (medium)

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B (medium) leads on average score with 7.1 vs 7.0. Kimi K2.5 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.600 vs $1.046. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B (medium) is faster at 64.16s vs 99.00s, with pass rates of 65.2% vs 71.2%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Rank
#85
Total Output Tokens
227,367
Response Time (avg)
99.00s
Total Cost
$0.600
Rank
#80
Total Output Tokens
487,218
Response Time (avg)
64.16s
Total Cost
$1.046
Recommended model Qwen3.5-122B-A10B (medium)

It has the best score here (7.1), while responding about 1.5x faster than Kimi K2.5 (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Kimi K2.5 Kimi K2.5 medium Release: 2026-01-27 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B Qwen3.5-122B-A10B medium Release: 2026-02-24
Score 7.0 7.1
Rank #85 #80
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.0 8.5
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 65.2% 71.2%
Flaky tests 8 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 4.789 8.509
Total Cost $0.600 $1.046
Input Price $0.571 / 1M $0.260 / 1M
Output Price $2.850 / 1M $2.080 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 118,448 124,771
Output Tokens 62,124 44,077
Reasoning Tokens 165,243 443,141
Response Time (avg) 99.00s 64.16s
Response Time (max) 281.00s 519.30s
Response Time (total) 1485.04s 1411.60s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#85 MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5

medium
Cost
$0.030
Time
58.6s
Tokens
8,683 tok

#80 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

medium
Cost
$0.019
Time
48.7s
Tokens
6,034 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Kimi K2.5 6.1 4.6 66.7% 2 217.49s 6,935 5,705 74,693
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 6.0 7.2 55.6% 1 114.48s 7,630 8,057 82,578

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair