Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Mistral: Mistral Small 4 vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-9B

Mistral Small 4 leads on average score with 5.1 vs 5.1. Qwen3.5-9B has the lower benchmark cost at $0.021 vs $0.022. Mistral Small 4 is faster at 1.20s vs 19.17s, with pass rates of 25.8% vs 19.7%.

Recommended modelMistral Small 4It has the best score here (5.1), while responding about 16.0x faster than Qwen3.5-9B.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Metric Mistral Small 4 Mistral Small 4 none Release: 2026-03-16 Qwen3.5-9B Qwen3.5-9B none Release: 2026-03-02
Score 5.1 5.1
Rank #179 #183
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.6 9.7
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 25.8% 19.7%
Flaky tests 1 1
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.432 0.490
Total Cost $0.022 $0.021
Input Price $0.150 / 1M $0.100 / 1M
Output Price $0.600 / 1M $0.150 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 104,708 144,407
Output Tokens 9,812 37,484
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 1.20s 19.17s
Response Time (max) 13.16s 382.06s
Response Time (total) 26.38s 421.74s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#179 Mistral Small 4

none
Cost
$0.002
Time
10.4s
Tokens
2,370 tok

#183 Qwen3.5-9B

none
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Mistral Small 4 3.7 9.7 0.0% 0 901ms 7,636 619 0
Qwen3.5-9B 3.9 7.8 11.1% 1 5.60s 7,913 1,042 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair