Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

AI BENCHY Compare

Meta: Muse Spark 1.1 vs OpenAI: GPT-5.2 Chat

Summary

Muse Spark 1.1 (medium) leads on average score with 8.9 vs 8.5. GPT-5.2 Chat has the lower benchmark cost at $0.393 vs $1.152. GPT-5.2 Chat is faster at 7.13s vs 23.35s, with pass rates of 76.2% vs 74.6%.

Recommended modelGPT-5.2 ChatIts score stays close to the best score here (8.5 vs 8.9), while costing about 2.9x less than Muse Spark 1.1 (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-16

Metric Muse Spark 1.1 Muse Spark 1.1 medium Release: 2026-07-16 GPT-5.2 Chat GPT-5.2 Chat none Release: 2025-12-11
Score 8.9 8.5
Rank #15 #25
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.2 8.9
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 76.2% 74.6%
Flaky tests 2 3
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 7.676 2.803
Total Cost $1.152 $0.393
Input Price $1.250 / 1M $1.750 / 1M
Output Price $4.250 / 1M $14.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 59,928 34,212
Output Tokens 3,523 23,744
Reasoning Tokens 249,752 0
Response Time (avg) 23.35s 7.13s
Response Time (max) 165.38s 38.52s
Response Time (total) 490.40s 149.69s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#15 Muse Spark 1.1

medium
Cost
$0.024
Time
29.2s
Tokens
5,774 tok

#25 GPT-5.2 Chat

none
Cost
$0.010
Time
15.3s
Tokens
797 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Muse Spark 1.1 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 15.66s 8,562 347 23,562
GPT-5.2 Chat 8.8 7.8 88.9% 1 9.82s 7,305 6,731 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair