Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Meituan: LongCat 2.0 vs OpenAI: GPT-5.5

GPT-5.5 (low) leads on average score with 9.3 vs 7.4. LongCat 2.0 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.478 vs $1.253. GPT-5.5 (low) is faster at 10.13s vs 136.64s, with pass rates of 60.6% vs 86.4%.

Recommended modelGPT-5.5 (low)It has the best score here (9.3), while responding about 13.5x faster than LongCat 2.0 (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-20

Metric LongCat 2.0 LongCat 2.0 medium Release: 2026-07-20 GPT-5.5 GPT-5.5 low Release: 2026-04-24
Score 7.4 9.3
Rank #60 #6
Reliability 9.8 10.0
Consistency 8.9 10.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 60.6% 86.4%
Flaky tests 3 0
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 3.978 6.594
Total Cost $0.478 $1.253
Input Price $0.300 / 1M $5.000 / 1M
Output Price $1.200 / 1M $30.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 97,315 80,058
Output Tokens 44,384 5,378
Reasoning Tokens 329,012 23,040
Response Time (avg) 136.64s 10.13s
Response Time (max) 939.52s 56.19s
Response Time (total) 3006.01s 222.82s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#60 LongCat 2.0

medium
Cost
$0.016
Time
285.1s
Tokens
13,057 tok

#6 GPT-5.5

low
Cost
$0.068
Time
37.0s
Tokens
2,339 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
LongCat 2.0 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 455.00s 7,419 533 214,143
GPT-5.5 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 15.04s 7,302 423 6,402

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair