Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 vs Meituan: LongCat 2.0

LongCat 2.0 (medium) leads on average score with 7.4 vs 7.3. LongCat 2.0 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.478 vs $1.166. Claude Opus 4.8 is faster at 4.91s vs 136.64s, with pass rates of 63.6% vs 60.6%.

Recommended modelClaude Opus 4.8Its score stays close to the best score here (7.3 vs 7.4), while responding about 27.8x faster than LongCat 2.0 (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-21

Metric Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 none Release: 2026-05-28 LongCat 2.0 LongCat 2.0 medium Release: 2026-07-20
Score 7.3 7.4
Rank #70 #64
Reliability 10.0 9.8
Consistency 9.2 8.9
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 63.6% 60.6%
Flaky tests 2 3
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 8.969 3.978
Total Cost $1.166 $0.478
Input Price $5.000 / 1M $0.300 / 1M
Output Price $25.000 / 1M $1.200 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 149,206 97,315
Output Tokens 16,797 44,384
Reasoning Tokens 0 329,012
Response Time (avg) 4.91s 136.64s
Response Time (max) 35.03s 939.52s
Response Time (total) 108.03s 3006.01s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#70 Claude Opus 4.8

none
Cost
$0.053
Time
22.0s
Tokens
2,253 tok

#64 LongCat 2.0

medium
Cost
$0.016
Time
285.1s
Tokens
13,057 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.8 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 3.29s 10,590 1,332 0
LongCat 2.0 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 455.00s 7,419 533 214,143

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair