Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 (high) vs Qwen3.6 Flash

Qwen3.6 Flash leads on average score with 6.1 vs 5.6. Qwen3.6 Flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.062 vs $0.077. Qwen3.6 Flash is faster at 3.74s vs 15.90s, with pass rates of 43.9% vs 34.9%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Rank
#156
Total Output Tokens
115,331
Response Time (avg)
15.90s
Total Cost
$0.077
Rank
#135
Total Output Tokens
30,947
Response Time (avg)
3.74s
Total Cost
$0.062
Recommended model Qwen3.6 Flash

It has the best score here (6.1), while responding about 4.2x faster than KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 (high).

Detailed comparison

Metric KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 high Release: 2026-07-14 Qwen3.6 Flash Qwen3.6 Flash none Release: 2026-04-20
Score 5.6 6.1
Rank #156 #135
Reliability 9.9 10.0
Consistency 7.7 9.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 43.9% 34.9%
Flaky tests 6 1
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 1.097 0.935
Total Cost $0.077 $0.062
Input Price $0.150 / 1M $0.188 / 1M
Output Price $0.600 / 1M $1.125 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 50,470 139,788
Output Tokens 3,957 30,947
Reasoning Tokens 111,374 0
Response Time (avg) 15.90s 3.74s
Response Time (max) 118.35s 48.79s
Response Time (total) 349.71s 82.38s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#156 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5

high
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#135 Qwen3.6 Flash

none
Cost
$0.005
Time
20.1s
Tokens
4,211 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 4.3 7.3 11.1% 1 39.07s 6,948 1,166 55,883
Qwen3.6 Flash 5.4 10.0 33.3% 0 1.79s 6,488 889 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair