Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

inclusionAI: Ring-2.6-1T vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-35B-A3B

Qwen3.5-35B-A3B (medium) leads on average score with 6.2 vs 4.8. Ring-2.6-1T has the lower benchmark cost at $0.026 vs $0.837. Ring-2.6-1T is faster at 55.10s vs 112.47s, with pass rates of 45.5% vs 66.7%.

Recommended modelRing-2.6-1TIt offers the best overall trade-off: a competitive score (4.8), lower cost than Qwen3.5-35B-A3B (medium), and balanced response time.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Metric Ring-2.6-1T Ring-2.6-1T none Release: 2026-05-10 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B Qwen3.5-35B-A3B medium Release: 2026-02-24
Score 4.8 6.2
Rank #194 #130
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.3 7.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 45.5% 66.7%
Flaky tests 2 6
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.000 9.130
Total Cost $0.026 $0.837
Input Price $0.075 / 1M $0.140 / 1M
Output Price $0.625 / 1M $1.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 7,599 130,388
Output Tokens 39,954 40,630
Reasoning Tokens 0 786,040
Response Time (avg) 55.10s 112.47s
Response Time (max) 143.82s 950.25s
Response Time (total) 881.55s 2474.28s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#194 Ring-2.6-1T

none
Ring-2.6-1T is no longer available as a free model. It has transitioned to a paid model. Continue using it here: https://openrouter.ai/inclusionai/ring-2.6-1t
Cost
$0.000
Time
0.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#130 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B

medium
Cost
$0.009
Time
71.4s
Tokens
8,631 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ring-2.6-1T 5.3 10.0 33.3% 0 143.82s 834 5,036 0
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 5.9 9.3 33.3% 0 206.65s 4,106 23,844 111,462

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair