Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

inclusionAI: Ring-2.6-1T vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-Flash

Ring-2.6-1T (medium) leads on average score with 6.3 vs 6.1. Qwen3.5-Flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.073 vs $0.103. Qwen3.5-Flash is faster at 25.28s vs 68.74s, with pass rates of 60.6% vs 39.4%.

Recommended modelQwen3.5-FlashIts score stays close to the best score here (6.1 vs 6.3), while responding about 2.7x faster than Ring-2.6-1T (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-17

Metric Ring-2.6-1T Ring-2.6-1T medium Release: 2026-05-10 Qwen3.5-Flash Qwen3.5-Flash none Release: 2026-02-24
Score 6.3 6.1
Rank #103 #118
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.5 9.3
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 60.6% 39.4%
Flaky tests 4 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.629 0.933
Total Cost $0.103 $0.073
Input Price $0.075 / 1M $0.065 / 1M
Output Price $0.625 / 1M $0.260 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 113,604 282,347
Output Tokens 123,079 209,201
Reasoning Tokens 42,754 0
Response Time (avg) 68.74s 25.28s
Response Time (max) 304.19s 480.96s
Response Time (total) 1374.86s 556.24s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#103 Ring-2.6-1T

medium
Ring-2.6-1T is no longer available as a free model. It has transitioned to a paid model. Continue using it here: https://openrouter.ai/inclusionai/ring-2.6-1t
Cost
$0.000
Time
0.1s
Tokens
0 tok

#118 Qwen3.5-Flash

none
Cost
$0.003
Time
47.4s
Tokens
7,799 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ring-2.6-1T 5.3 10.0 33.3% 0 59.65s 834 1,369 3,985
Qwen3.5-Flash 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 850ms 7,913 519 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair