Navigate
Advertise here

Ling-3.0-flash vs Solar Pro 4

Solar Pro 4 leads on average score with 5.8 vs 5.7. Ling-3.0-flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.004 vs $0.017. Ling-3.0-flash is faster at 3.56s vs 5.37s, with pass rates of 27.3% vs 33.3%.

Last updated at: 2026-09-24

Compared models

Rank
#257
Total Output Tokens
12,777
Response Time (avg)
3.56s
Total Cost
$0.004
Rank
#252
Total Output Tokens
11,912
Response Time (avg)
5.37s
Total Cost
$0.017
Recommended model Ling-3.0-flash

Its score stays close to the best score here (5.7 vs 5.8), while costing about 4.7x less than Solar Pro 4.

Detailed comparison

Metric Ling-3.0-flash Ling-3.0-flash none Release: 2026-07-24 Solar Pro 4 Solar Pro 4 none Release: 2026-08-11
Score 5.7 5.8
Rank #257 #252
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 10.0 9.6
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 27.3% 33.3%
Flaky tests 0 1
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.000 0.077
Total Cost $0.004 $0.017
Input Price $0.021 / 1M $0.090 / 1M
Output Price $0.063 / 1M $0.360 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 123,993 130,863
Output Tokens 12,777 11,912
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 3.56s 5.37s
Response Time (max) 17.51s 64.67s
Response Time (total) 74.74s 118.06s
Parameters 124B total (5.1B active) ~100B
Availability Open source Closed

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#257 Ling-3.0-flash

none
Cost
$0.000
Time
11.6s
Tokens
2,781 tok

#252 Solar Pro 4

none
No showcase result has been generated for this model yet.
Cost
N/A
Time
-
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling-3.0-flash 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 6.39s 8,307 639 0
Solar Pro 4 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 2.61s 7,896 557 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair