Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Ling 3.0 Flash vs Solar Pro 4

Solar Pro 4 leads on average score with 5.8 vs 5.7. Ling 3.0 Flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.004 vs $0.006. Ling 3.0 Flash is faster at 3.46s vs 4.90s, with pass rates of 27.3% vs 31.8%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-11

Rank
#179
Total Output Tokens
12,783
Response Time (avg)
3.46s
Total Cost
$0.004
Rank
#175
Total Output Tokens
11,911
Response Time (avg)
4.90s
Total Cost
$0.006
Recommended model Ling 3.0 Flash

Its score stays close to the best score here (5.7 vs 5.8), while costing about 1.6x less than Solar Pro 4.

Detailed comparison

Metric Ling 3.0 Flash Ling 3.0 Flash none Release: 2026-07-24 Free Available Solar Pro 4 Solar Pro 4 none Release: 2026-08-11
Score 5.7 5.8
Rank #179 #175
Reliability 9.9 10.0
Consistency 10.0 10.0
Benchmark coverage 22/22 tests · 66/66 attempts 22/22 tests · 66/66 attempts
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 27.3% 31.8%
Flaky tests 0 0
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.000 0.077
Total Cost $0.004 $0.006
Input Price $0.021 / 1M $0.030 / 1M
Output Price $0.063 / 1M $0.120 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 124,176 130,854
Output Tokens 12,783 11,911
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 3.46s 4.90s
Response Time (max) 17.51s 64.67s
Response Time (total) 76.06s 107.82s

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#179 Ling 3.0 Flash

none
Cost
$0.000
Time
11.6s
Tokens
2,781 tok

#175 Solar Pro 4

none
No showcase result has been generated for this model yet.
Cost
$0.000
Time
-
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling 3.0 Flash 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 6.39s 8,307 639 0
Solar Pro 4 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 2.61s 7,896 557 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair