Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Solar Pro 4 vs GLM 5.3 Flash (low)

GLM 5.3 Flash (low) leads on average score with 5.9 vs 5.8. Solar Pro 4 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.006 vs $0.015. Solar Pro 4 is faster at 5.37s vs 9.65s, with pass rates of 33.3% vs 56.1%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-26

Rank
#199
Total Output Tokens
11,912
Response Time (avg)
5.37s
Total Cost
$0.006
Rank
#195
Total Output Tokens
23,736
Response Time (avg)
9.65s
Total Cost
$0.015
Recommended model Solar Pro 4

Its score stays close to the best score here (5.8 vs 5.9), while costing about 2.8x less than GLM 5.3 Flash (low).

Detailed comparison

Metric Solar Pro 4 Solar Pro 4 none Release: 2026-08-11 GLM 5.3 Flash GLM 5.3 Flash low Release: 2026-08-26
Score 5.8 5.9
Rank #199 #195
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.6 8.4
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 33.3% 56.1%
Flaky tests 1 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.077 0.148
Total Cost $0.006 $0.015
Input Price $0.030 / 1M $0.075 / 1M
Output Price $0.120 / 1M $0.250 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 130,863 117,551
Output Tokens 11,912 9,199
Reasoning Tokens 0 14,537
Response Time (avg) 5.37s 9.65s
Response Time (max) 64.67s 90.45s
Response Time (total) 118.06s 212.22s
Parameters ~100B 320B total (18B active)
Availability Closed Open source

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#199 Solar Pro 4

none
No showcase result has been generated for this model yet.
Cost
N/A
Time
-
Tokens
0 tok

#195 GLM 5.3 Flash

low
Cost
$0.001
Time
20.7s
Tokens
1,482 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Solar Pro 4 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 2.61s 7,896 557 0
GLM 5.3 Flash 5.4 7.2 44.4% 1 10.38s 7,317 398 3,973

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair