Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

GPT-5.4 vs GLM 5.3 Flash (low)

GLM 5.3 Flash (low) leads on average score with 5.9 vs 5.8. GLM 5.3 Flash (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.015 vs $0.397. GPT-5.4 is faster at 2.08s vs 9.65s, with pass rates of 34.9% vs 56.1%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-26

Rank
#198
Total Output Tokens
8,339
Response Time (avg)
2.08s
Total Cost
$0.397
Rank
#195
Total Output Tokens
23,736
Response Time (avg)
9.65s
Total Cost
$0.015
Recommended model GLM 5.3 Flash (low)

It has the best score here (5.9), while costing about 26.9x less than GPT-5.4.

Detailed comparison

Metric GPT-5.4 GPT-5.4 none Release: 2026-03-05 GLM 5.3 Flash GLM 5.3 Flash low Release: 2026-08-26
Score 5.8 5.9
Rank #198 #195
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.2 8.4
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 34.9% 56.1%
Flaky tests 2 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 5.667 0.148
Total Cost $0.397 $0.015
Input Price $2.500 / 1M $0.075 / 1M
Output Price $15.000 / 1M $0.250 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 108,641 117,551
Output Tokens 8,339 9,199
Reasoning Tokens 0 14,537
Response Time (avg) 2.08s 9.65s
Response Time (max) 15.63s 90.45s
Response Time (total) 45.75s 212.22s
Parameters ~1.5T total (~100B active) 320B total (18B active)
Availability Closed Open source

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#198 GPT-5.4

none
Cost
$0.026
Time
18.1s
Tokens
1,792 tok

#195 GLM 5.3 Flash

low
Cost
$0.001
Time
20.7s
Tokens
1,482 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
GPT-5.4 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.62s 7,305 516 0
GLM 5.3 Flash 5.4 7.2 44.4% 1 10.38s 7,317 398 3,973

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair