Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Seed 2.1 Turbo vs GLM 5.3 Flash (low)

The average score is effectively tied at 5.9 vs 5.9. GLM 5.3 Flash (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.015 vs $0.092. Seed 2.1 Turbo is faster at 6.84s vs 9.65s, with pass rates of 54.6% vs 56.1%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-26

Rank
#197
Total Output Tokens
10,643
Response Time (avg)
6.84s
Total Cost
$0.092
Rank
#195
Total Output Tokens
23,736
Response Time (avg)
9.65s
Total Cost
$0.015
Recommended model GLM 5.3 Flash (low)

It has the best score here (5.9), while costing about 6.2x less than Seed 2.1 Turbo.

Detailed comparison

Metric Seed 2.1 Turbo Seed 2.1 Turbo none Release: 2026-08-12 GLM 5.3 Flash GLM 5.3 Flash low Release: 2026-08-26
Score 5.9 5.9
Rank #197 #195
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.9 8.4
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 54.6% 56.1%
Flaky tests 3 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.912 0.148
Total Cost $0.092 $0.015
Input Price $0.500 / 1M $0.075 / 1M
Output Price $2.500 / 1M $0.250 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 129,150 117,551
Output Tokens 10,643 9,199
Reasoning Tokens 0 14,537
Response Time (avg) 6.84s 9.65s
Response Time (max) 55.92s 90.45s
Response Time (total) 150.46s 212.22s
Parameters ~200B total (~20B active) 320B total (18B active)
Availability Closed Open source

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#197 Seed 2.1 Turbo

none
Cost
$0.093
Time
517.1s
Tokens
37,102 tok

#195 GLM 5.3 Flash

low
Cost
$0.001
Time
20.7s
Tokens
1,482 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Seed 2.1 Turbo 4.5 7.9 22.2% 1 2.35s 8,211 608 0
GLM 5.3 Flash 5.4 7.2 44.4% 1 10.38s 7,317 398 3,973

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair