- Score
- 9.4 (+3.65 points)
- Total Cost (Current Price)
- $0.183 · 0.2% costlier
- Response Time (avg)
- 6.24s · 35.3% faster
Summary
Seed 2.1 Turbo scores 5.7 on AI BENCHY and ranks #281. It has 10.0 reliability, a 52.2% pass rate, $0.182 total cost, and 9.65s average response time.
What makes Seed 2.1 Turbo unique: It stands out most in Domain specific, where it ranks #1, while Coding is its weakest area at #13.
Recommended alternatives
We recommend choosing one of these models instead:
- Score
- 8.6 (+2.86 points)
- Total Cost (Current Price)
- $0.061 · 66.8% cheaper
- Response Time (avg)
- 7.51s · 22.2% faster
- Score
- 6.8 (+1.10 points)
- Total Cost (Current Price)
- $0.039 · 78.9% cheaper
- Response Time (avg)
- 6.66s · 30.9% faster
Model facts
Researched on 2026-08-12
- Parameters
- ~200B total (~20B active)
- Architecture
- MoE
- Availability
- Closed
- License
- -
Best estimate from public evidence; the vendor did not disclose every value. The exact API checkpoint is closed and its architecture and parameter counts are not disclosed; estimate follows the Seed2 production tier.
5.7
Consistency
9.0
10.0
$0.182
Total Output Tokens
13,105
Total Input Tokens
298,242
Input Price
$0.500 / 1M
Output Price
$2.500 / 1M
Cache Read Price
N/A
Cache Write Price
N/A
Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.
Flaky tests
3
Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#281 Seed 2.1 Turbo
none- Cost
- $0.093
- Time
- 517.1s
- Tokens
- 37,102 tok
Run history
| Tested on | Score | Reliability | Tests Correct | Total Cost | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-01 04:01 Re-test | 5.7 | 10.0 | $0.182 | Current run | |
| 2026-08-12 22:25 Initial run | 5.7 | 10.0 | $0.092 | Compare |
This run used a different benchmark suite. Keep suite changes in mind when reading historical movement.
Charts
Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Quick Compare
Category Breakdown
| Category | Score | Consistency | Tests Correct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic | 5.0 | 10.0 | |
| Anti-AI Tricks | 4.8 | 10.0 | |
| Coding | 4.5 | 7.9 | |
| Combined | 3.8 | 5.8 | |
| Data parsing and extraction | 7.1 | 5.6 | |
| Domain specific | 7.7 | 10.0 | |
| General Intelligence | 5.0 | 10.0 | |
| Instructions following | 9.8 | 10.0 | |
| Puzzle Solving | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Tool Calling | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Trivia | 3.0 | 10.0 |