Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Ling 3.0 Flash vs OpenAI: GPT-5.4

GPT-5.4 leads on average score with 5.8 vs 5.7. Ling 3.0 Flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.000 vs $0.397. GPT-5.4 is faster at 2.07s vs 3.46s, with pass rates of 27.3% vs 34.9%.

Recommended modelGPT-5.4It has the best score here (5.8), while responding about 1.7x faster than Ling 3.0 Flash.

Last updated at: 2026-07-24

Metric Ling 3.0 Flash Ling 3.0 Flash none Release: 2026-07-24 Free Available GPT-5.4 GPT-5.4 none Release: 2026-03-05
Score 5.7 5.8
Rank #149 #146
Reliability 9.9 10.0
Consistency 10.0 9.2
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 27.3% 34.9%
Flaky tests 0 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.000 5.663
Total Cost $0.000 $0.397
Input Price $0.000 / 1M $2.500 / 1M
Output Price $0.000 / 1M $15.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 124,176 108,632
Output Tokens 12,783 8,321
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 3.46s 2.07s
Response Time (max) 17.51s 15.63s
Response Time (total) 76.06s 45.51s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#149 Ling 3.0 Flash

none
Cost
$0.000
Time
11.6s
Tokens
2,781 tok

#146 GPT-5.4

none
Cost
$0.026
Time
18.1s
Tokens
1,792 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling 3.0 Flash 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 6.39s 8,307 639 0
GPT-5.4 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.62s 7,305 516 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair