Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Ling 3.0 Flash vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6

Kimi K2.6 leads on average score with 5.8 vs 5.7. Ling 3.0 Flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.000 vs $0.184. Ling 3.0 Flash is faster at 3.46s vs 19.58s, with pass rates of 27.3% vs 34.9%.

Recommended modelKimi K2.6It has the strongest score in this comparison (5.8) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Last updated at: 2026-07-24

Metric Ling 3.0 Flash Ling 3.0 Flash none Release: 2026-07-24 Free Available Kimi K2.6 Kimi K2.6 none Release: 2026-04-20
Score 5.7 5.8
Rank #149 #145
Reliability 9.9 10.0
Consistency 10.0 9.3
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 27.3% 34.9%
Flaky tests 0 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.000 3.199
Total Cost $0.000 $0.184
Input Price $0.000 / 1M $0.684 / 1M
Output Price $0.000 / 1M $3.420 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 124,176 116,970
Output Tokens 12,783 30,253
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 3.46s 19.58s
Response Time (max) 17.51s 238.89s
Response Time (total) 76.06s 430.85s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#149 Ling 3.0 Flash

none
Cost
$0.000
Time
11.6s
Tokens
2,781 tok

#145 MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6

none
Cost
$0.020
Time
127.4s
Tokens
4,429 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling 3.0 Flash 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 6.39s 8,307 639 0
Kimi K2.6 5.5 9.8 33.3% 0 82.57s 5,986 14,754 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair