Navigate
Advertise here

Ling-3.0-flash vs Kimi K2.6

The average score is effectively tied at 5.7 vs 5.7. Ling-3.0-flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.004 vs $0.233. Ling-3.0-flash is faster at 3.56s vs 19.57s, with pass rates of 27.3% vs 30.3%.

Last updated at: 2026-09-22

Compared models

Rank
#242
Total Output Tokens
12,777
Response Time (avg)
3.56s
Total Cost
$0.004
Rank
#244
Total Output Tokens
30,249
Response Time (avg)
19.57s
Total Cost
$0.233
Recommended model Ling-3.0-flash

It has the best score here (5.7), while costing about 68.1x less than Kimi K2.6.

Detailed comparison

Metric Ling-3.0-flash Ling-3.0-flash none Release: 2026-07-24 Kimi K2.6 Kimi K2.6 none Release: 2026-04-20
Score 5.7 5.7
Rank #242 #244
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 10.0 9.3
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 27.3% 30.3%
Flaky tests 0 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.000 3.732
Total Cost $0.004 $0.233
Input Price $0.021 / 1M $0.950 / 1M
Output Price $0.063 / 1M $4.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 123,993 116,983
Output Tokens 12,777 30,249
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 3.56s 19.57s
Response Time (max) 17.51s 238.89s
Response Time (total) 74.74s 430.58s
Parameters 124B total (5.1B active) 1T total (32B active)
Availability Open source Weights available

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#242 Ling-3.0-flash

none
Cost
$0.000
Time
11.6s
Tokens
2,781 tok

#244 MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6

none
Cost
$0.020
Time
127.4s
Tokens
4,429 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling-3.0-flash 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 6.39s 8,307 639 0
Kimi K2.6 5.5 9.8 33.3% 0 82.57s 5,986 14,754 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair