Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Kimi K2.6 vs Hy4 preview (low)

Kimi K2.6 leads on average score with 5.7 vs 5.6. Kimi K2.6 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.233 vs $1.745. Kimi K2.6 is faster at 19.57s vs 214.25s, with pass rates of 30.3% vs 19.7%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-29

Rank
#206
Total Output Tokens
30,249
Response Time (avg)
19.57s
Total Cost
$0.233
Rank
#217
Total Output Tokens
682,538
Response Time (avg)
214.25s
Total Cost
$1.745
Recommended model Kimi K2.6

It has the best score here (5.7), while costing about 7.5x less than Hy4 preview (low).

Detailed comparison

Metric Kimi K2.6 Kimi K2.6 none Release: 2026-04-20 Hy4 preview Hy4 preview low Release: 2026-08-29
Score 5.7 5.6
Rank #206 #217
Reliability 10.0 5.4
Consistency 9.3 8.5
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 30.3% 19.7%
Flaky tests 2 3
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 3.732 58.157
Total Cost $0.233 $1.745
Input Price $0.950 / 1M $0.834 / 1M
Output Price $4.000 / 1M $2.501 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 116,983 45,154
Output Tokens 30,249 4,022
Reasoning Tokens 0 678,516
Response Time (avg) 19.57s 214.25s
Response Time (max) 238.89s 597.45s
Response Time (total) 430.58s 4713.56s
Parameters 1T total (32B active) 770B total (49B active)
Availability Weights available Open source

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#206 MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6

none
Cost
$0.020
Time
127.4s
Tokens
4,429 tok

#217 Hy4 preview

low
Provider returned error
Cost
$0.000
Time
1.1s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Kimi K2.6 5.5 9.8 33.3% 0 82.57s 5,986 14,754 0
Hy4 preview 5.2 8.6 0.0% 0 219.15s 6,110 135 96,407

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair