Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Qwen3.8 27B vs Hy4 preview (low)

The average score is effectively tied at 5.5 vs 5.6. Qwen3.8 27B has the lower benchmark cost at ~$0.006 vs $1.745. Qwen3.8 27B is faster at 3.12s vs 214.25s, with pass rates of 40.9% vs 19.7%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-29

Rank
#220
Total Output Tokens
11,445
Response Time (avg)
3.12s
Total Cost
~$0.006
Rank
#217
Total Output Tokens
682,538
Response Time (avg)
214.25s
Total Cost
$1.745
Recommended model Qwen3.8 27B

It has the best score here (5.5), while costing about 308.3x less than Hy4 preview (low).

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.8 27B Qwen3.8 27B none Release: 2026-08-14 Hy4 preview Hy4 preview low Release: 2026-08-29
Score 5.5 5.6
Rank #220 #217
Reliability 10.0 5.4
Consistency 10.0 8.5
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 40.9% 19.7%
Flaky tests 0 3
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result ~0.063 58.157
Total Cost ~$0.006 $1.745
Input Price N/A $0.834 / 1M
Output Price N/A $2.501 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 122,463 45,154
Output Tokens 11,445 4,022
Reasoning Tokens 0 678,516
Response Time (avg) 3.12s 214.25s
Response Time (max) 44.76s 597.45s
Response Time (total) 68.69s 4713.56s
Parameters 27.3B 770B total (49B active)
Availability Weights available Open source

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#220 Qwen3.8 27B

none
Cost
~$0.001
Time
23.9s
Tokens
1,922 tok

#217 Hy4 preview

low
Provider returned error
Cost
$0.000
Time
1.1s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.8 27B 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.19s 7,911 408 0
Hy4 preview 5.2 8.6 0.0% 0 219.15s 6,110 135 96,407

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair