Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

inclusionAI: Ling-2.6-flash vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna

GPT-5.6 Luna leads on average score with 5.4 vs 4.9. Ling-2.6-flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.002 vs $0.142. GPT-5.6 Luna is faster at 1.50s vs 10.68s, with pass rates of 30.3% vs 34.9%.

Recommended modelGPT-5.6 LunaIt has the best score here (5.4), while responding about 7.1x faster than Ling-2.6-flash.

Last updated at: 2026-07-21

Metric Ling-2.6-flash Ling-2.6-flash none Release: 2026-04-21 GPT-5.6 Luna GPT-5.6 Luna none Release: 2026-07-09
Score 4.9 5.4
Rank #184 #165
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.3 8.8
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 30.3% 34.9%
Flaky tests 2 3
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.024 2.360
Total Cost $0.002 $0.142
Input Price $0.010 / 1M $1.000 / 1M
Output Price $0.030 / 1M $6.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 114,375 101,323
Output Tokens 14,903 6,709
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 10.68s 1.50s
Response Time (max) 36.03s 10.57s
Response Time (total) 213.51s 32.91s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#184 Ling-2.6-flash

none
Ling-2.6-flash is no longer available as a free model. It has transitioned to a paid model. Continue using it here: https://openrouter.ai/inclusionai/ling-2.6-flash
Cost
$0.000
Time
0.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#165 GPT-5.6 Luna

none
Cost
$0.016
Time
15.8s
Tokens
2,685 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling-2.6-flash 5.3 10.0 33.3% 0 11.21s 813 381 0
GPT-5.6 Luna 3.8 7.2 22.2% 1 980ms 7,302 459 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair