Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Mercury 2 vs GLM 4.7 Flash

GLM 4.7 Flash leads on average score with 4.8 vs 4.7. GLM 4.7 Flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.016 vs $0.030. Mercury 2 is faster at 825ms vs 8.81s, with pass rates of 24.2% vs 30.3%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-15

Rank
#259
Total Output Tokens
9,584
Response Time (avg)
825ms
Total Cost
$0.030
Rank
#253
Total Output Tokens
22,992
Response Time (avg)
8.81s
Total Cost
$0.016
Recommended model Mercury 2

Its score stays close to the best score here (4.7 vs 4.8), while responding about 10.7x faster than GLM 4.7 Flash.

Detailed comparison

Metric Mercury 2 Mercury 2 none Release: 2026-02-24 GLM 4.7 Flash GLM 4.7 Flash none Release: 2026-01-19
Score 4.7 4.8
Rank #259 #253
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.2 8.9
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 24.2% 30.3%
Flaky tests 2 3
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.740 0.307
Total Cost $0.030 $0.016
Input Price $0.250 / 1M $0.060 / 1M
Output Price $0.750 / 1M $0.400 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 89,637 101,513
Output Tokens 9,584 22,992
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 825ms 8.81s
Response Time (max) 4.52s 97.15s
Response Time (total) 18.14s 140.88s
Parameters ~100B 30B total (3B active)
Availability Closed Open source

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#259 Mercury 2

none
Cost
$0.002
Time
1.8s
Tokens
1,514 tok

#253 GLM 4.7 Flash

none
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Mercury 2 3.4 9.6 0.0% 0 1.03s 7,229 3,088 0
GLM 4.7 Flash 4.3 10.0 0.0% 0 2.54s 7,256 650 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair