Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Gemma 4 31B vs Qwen3.6 Flash

Gemma 4 31B leads on average score with 6.2 vs 6.1. Gemma 4 31B has the lower benchmark cost at $0.023 vs $0.062. Qwen3.6 Flash is faster at 3.74s vs 5.34s, with pass rates of 48.5% vs 34.9%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Rank
#126
Total Output Tokens
13,317
Response Time (avg)
5.34s
Total Cost
$0.023
Rank
#135
Total Output Tokens
30,947
Response Time (avg)
3.74s
Total Cost
$0.062
Recommended model Gemma 4 31B

It has the best score here (6.2), while costing about 2.7x less than Qwen3.6 Flash.

Detailed comparison

Metric Gemma 4 31B Gemma 4 31B none Release: 2026-04-02 Free Available Qwen3.6 Flash Qwen3.6 Flash none Release: 2026-04-20
Score 6.2 6.1
Rank #126 #135
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.6 9.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 48.5% 34.9%
Flaky tests 1 1
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.330 0.935
Total Cost $0.023 $0.062
Input Price $0.140 / 1M $0.188 / 1M
Output Price $0.400 / 1M $1.125 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 125,728 139,788
Output Tokens 13,317 30,947
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 5.34s 3.74s
Response Time (max) 29.95s 48.79s
Response Time (total) 106.82s 82.38s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#126 Gemma 4 31B

none
Cost
$0.001
Time
12.8s
Tokens
795 tok

#135 Qwen3.6 Flash

none
Cost
$0.005
Time
20.1s
Tokens
4,211 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemma 4 31B 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 11.19s 8,381 735 0
Qwen3.6 Flash 5.4 10.0 33.3% 0 1.79s 6,488 889 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair