Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Gemma 4 31B (medium) vs GPT-5.2 Chat

GPT-5.2 Chat leads on average score with 8.0 vs 6.3. Gemma 4 31B (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.116 vs $0.604. GPT-5.2 Chat is faster at 7.65s vs 75.38s, with pass rates of 68.2% vs 74.2%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-28

Rank
#124
Total Output Tokens
257,746
Response Time (avg)
75.38s
Total Cost
$0.116
Rank
#37
Total Output Tokens
30,424
Response Time (avg)
7.65s
Total Cost
$0.604
Recommended model GPT-5.2 Chat

It has the best score here (8.0), while responding about 9.8x faster than Gemma 4 31B (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Gemma 4 31B Gemma 4 31B medium Release: 2026-04-02 Free Available GPT-5.2 Chat GPT-5.2 Chat none Release: 2025-12-11
Score 6.3 8.0
Rank #124 #37
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.0 8.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 68.2% 74.2%
Flaky tests 2 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 1.044 4.308
Total Cost $0.116 $0.604
Input Price $0.140 / 1M $1.750 / 1M
Output Price $0.400 / 1M $14.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 94,992 101,248
Output Tokens 34,468 30,424
Reasoning Tokens 223,278 0
Response Time (avg) 75.38s 7.65s
Response Time (max) 437.40s 38.52s
Response Time (total) 1507.52s 168.39s

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#124 Gemma 4 31B

medium
Cost
$0.002
Time
45.7s
Tokens
2,696 tok

#37 GPT-5.2 Chat

none
Cost
$0.010
Time
15.3s
Tokens
797 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemma 4 31B 4.3 5.8 22.2% 1 219.76s 5,568 11,098 33,212
GPT-5.2 Chat 8.8 7.8 88.9% 1 9.82s 7,305 6,731 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair