Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5

Gemma 4 26B A4B (medium) leads on average score with 6.6 vs 6.5. MiMo-V2.5 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.082 vs $0.089. MiMo-V2.5 (medium) is faster at 32.20s vs 103.83s, with pass rates of 66.7% vs 69.7%.

Recommended modelMiMo-V2.5 (medium)Its score stays close to the best score here (6.5 vs 6.6), while responding about 3.2x faster than Gemma 4 26B A4B (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-21

Metric Gemma 4 26B A4B Gemma 4 26B A4B medium Release: 2026-04-03 Free Available MiMo-V2.5 MiMo-V2.5 medium Release: 2026-04-22
Score 6.6 6.5
Rank #100 #107
Reliability 9.4 10.0
Consistency 9.2 7.9
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 66.7% 69.7%
Flaky tests 2 6
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.643 3.124
Total Cost $0.089 $0.082
Input Price $0.070 / 1M $0.140 / 1M
Output Price $0.340 / 1M $0.280 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 77,550 105,447
Output Tokens 28,036 7,120
Reasoning Tokens 219,491 230,682
Response Time (avg) 103.83s 32.20s
Response Time (max) 912.19s 162.44s
Response Time (total) 2180.47s 708.46s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#100 Gemma 4 26B A4B

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#107 MiMo-V2.5

medium
Cost
$0.002
Time
54.8s
Tokens
5,247 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemma 4 26B A4B 2.9 10.0 0.0% 0 272.54s 5,062 14,838 44,567
MiMo-V2.5 6.2 4.7 66.7% 2 97.14s 7,422 557 81,977

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair