Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Gemma 4 26B A4B (medium) vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B (medium)

Qwen3.6 35B A3B (medium) leads on average score with 6.7 vs 6.6. Gemma 4 26B A4B (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.096 vs $0.746. Qwen3.6 35B A3B (medium) is faster at 58.06s vs 103.83s, with pass rates of 66.7% vs 60.6%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Rank
#104
Total Output Tokens
247,527
Response Time (avg)
103.83s
Total Cost
$0.096
Rank
#98
Total Output Tokens
740,585
Response Time (avg)
58.06s
Total Cost
$0.746
Recommended model Gemma 4 26B A4B (medium)

Its score stays close to the best score here (6.6 vs 6.7), while costing about 7.8x less than Qwen3.6 35B A3B (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Gemma 4 26B A4B Gemma 4 26B A4B medium Release: 2026-04-03 Free Available Qwen3.6 35B A3B Qwen3.6 35B A3B medium Release: 2026-04-20
Score 6.6 6.7
Rank #104 #98
Reliability 9.4 10.0
Consistency 9.2 9.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 66.7% 60.6%
Flaky tests 2 1
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.643 5.712
Total Cost $0.096 $0.746
Input Price $0.120 / 1M $0.140 / 1M
Output Price $0.350 / 1M $1.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 77,550 85,139
Output Tokens 28,036 61,819
Reasoning Tokens 219,491 678,766
Response Time (avg) 103.83s 58.06s
Response Time (max) 912.19s 817.57s
Response Time (total) 2180.47s 1161.18s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#104 Gemma 4 26B A4B

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#98 Qwen3.6 35B A3B

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemma 4 26B A4B 2.9 10.0 0.0% 0 272.54s 5,062 14,838 44,567
Qwen3.6 35B A3B 7.7 10.0 66.7% 0 50.55s 5,051 7,929 37,223

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair