Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5

Gemini 3.6 Flash (medium) leads on average score with 9.9 vs 5.1. MiMo-V2.5 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.025 vs $0.831. MiMo-V2.5 is faster at 4.62s vs 10.11s, with pass rates of 98.5% vs 25.8%.

Recommended modelGemini 3.6 Flash (medium)It has the strongest score in this comparison (9.9) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Last updated at: 2026-07-21

Metric Gemini 3.6 Flash Gemini 3.6 Flash medium Release: 2026-07-21 MiMo-V2.5 MiMo-V2.5 none Release: 2026-04-22
Score 9.9 5.1
Rank #1 #174
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.6 9.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 98.5% 25.8%
Flaky tests 1 1
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 3.955 0.770
Total Cost $0.831 $0.025
Input Price $1.500 / 1M $0.140 / 1M
Output Price $7.500 / 1M $0.280 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 66,293 141,043
Output Tokens 2,000 16,464
Reasoning Tokens 95,464 0
Response Time (avg) 10.11s 4.62s
Response Time (max) 68.03s 55.36s
Response Time (total) 222.33s 101.57s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#1 Gemini 3.6 Flash

medium
Cost
$0.079
Time
47.9s
Tokens
10,532 tok

#174 MiMo-V2.5

none
Cost
$0.007
Time
267.4s
Tokens
25,283 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.6 Flash 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 17.49s 8,136 474 40,157
MiMo-V2.5 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 3.24s 7,440 696 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair