Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Kwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 vs Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5

KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 (high) leads on average score with 5.6 vs 5.1. MiMo-V2.5 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.025 vs $0.077. MiMo-V2.5 is faster at 4.62s vs 15.90s, with pass rates of 43.9% vs 25.8%.

Recommended modelKAT-Coder-Air V2.5 (high)It has the strongest score in this comparison (5.6) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Last updated at: 2026-07-21

Metric KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 high Release: 2026-07-14 MiMo-V2.5 MiMo-V2.5 none Release: 2026-04-22
Score 5.6 5.1
Rank #150 #174
Reliability 9.9 10.0
Consistency 7.7 9.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 43.9% 25.8%
Flaky tests 6 1
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 1.097 0.770
Total Cost $0.077 $0.025
Input Price $0.150 / 1M $0.140 / 1M
Output Price $0.600 / 1M $0.280 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 50,470 141,043
Output Tokens 3,957 16,464
Reasoning Tokens 111,374 0
Response Time (avg) 15.90s 4.62s
Response Time (max) 118.35s 55.36s
Response Time (total) 349.71s 101.57s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#150 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5

high
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#174 MiMo-V2.5

none
Cost
$0.007
Time
267.4s
Tokens
25,283 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 4.3 7.3 11.1% 1 39.07s 6,948 1,166 55,883
MiMo-V2.5 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 3.24s 7,440 696 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair