Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Qwen: Qwen3.7 Max

Gemini 3.6 Flash (high) leads on average score with 9.7 vs 9.2. Qwen3.7 Max (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $1.116 vs $1.785. Gemini 3.6 Flash (high) is faster at 14.88s vs 40.57s, with pass rates of 98.5% vs 87.9%.

Recommended modelGemini 3.6 Flash (high)It has the best score here (9.7), while responding about 2.7x faster than Qwen3.7 Max (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-21

Metric Gemini 3.6 Flash Gemini 3.6 Flash high Release: 2026-07-21 Qwen3.7 Max Qwen3.7 Max medium Release: 2026-05-22
Score 9.7 9.2
Rank #2 #11
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.6 9.3
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 98.5% 87.9%
Flaky tests 1 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 8.497 8.292
Total Cost $1.785 $1.116
Input Price $1.500 / 1M $1.475 / 1M
Output Price $7.500 / 1M $4.425 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 87,819 106,020
Output Tokens 5,750 5,748
Reasoning Tokens 214,596 211,004
Response Time (avg) 14.88s 40.57s
Response Time (max) 88.00s 556.06s
Response Time (total) 327.37s 892.57s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#2 Gemini 3.6 Flash

high
Cost
$0.069
Time
44.0s
Tokens
9,251 tok

#11 Qwen3.7 Max

medium
Cost
$0.017
Time
68.8s
Tokens
4,526 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.6 Flash 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 26.73s 8,136 448 60,606
Qwen3.7 Max 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 35.31s 7,893 423 34,808

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair