Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Qwen: Qwen3.7 Max

Gemini 3.6 Flash (low) leads on average score with 9.4 vs 9.2. Gemini 3.6 Flash (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.517 vs $1.116. Gemini 3.6 Flash (low) is faster at 4.42s vs 40.57s, with pass rates of 97.0% vs 87.9%.

Recommended modelGemini 3.6 Flash (low)It has the best score here (9.4), while costing about 2.2x less than Qwen3.7 Max (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-21

Metric Gemini 3.6 Flash Gemini 3.6 Flash low Release: 2026-07-21 Qwen3.7 Max Qwen3.7 Max medium Release: 2026-05-22
Score 9.4 9.2
Rank #6 #11
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.6 9.3
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 97.0% 87.9%
Flaky tests 1 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 2.461 8.292
Total Cost $0.517 $1.116
Input Price $1.500 / 1M $1.475 / 1M
Output Price $7.500 / 1M $4.425 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 82,715 106,020
Output Tokens 5,729 5,748
Reasoning Tokens 46,633 211,004
Response Time (avg) 4.42s 40.57s
Response Time (max) 28.92s 556.06s
Response Time (total) 97.13s 892.57s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#6 Gemini 3.6 Flash

low
Cost
$0.050
Time
28.1s
Tokens
6,731 tok

#11 Qwen3.7 Max

medium
Cost
$0.017
Time
68.8s
Tokens
4,526 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.6 Flash 7.8 7.4 77.8% 1 7.28s 8,136 451 15,026
Qwen3.7 Max 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 35.31s 7,893 423 34,808

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair