Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Qwen: Qwen3.7 Max vs xAI: Grok 4.5

Qwen3.7 Max (medium) leads on average score with 9.2 vs 8.4. Grok 4.5 (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.935 vs $1.116. Grok 4.5 (low) is faster at 15.56s vs 40.57s, with pass rates of 87.9% vs 75.8%.

Recommended modelQwen3.7 Max (medium)It has the strongest score in this comparison (9.2) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Last updated at: 2026-07-21

Metric Qwen3.7 Max Qwen3.7 Max medium Release: 2026-05-22 Grok 4.5 Grok 4.5 low Release: 2026-07-08
Score 9.2 8.4
Rank #11 #23
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.3 9.7
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 87.9% 75.8%
Flaky tests 2 1
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 8.292 5.844
Total Cost $1.116 $0.935
Input Price $1.475 / 1M $2.000 / 1M
Output Price $4.425 / 1M $6.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 106,020 125,596
Output Tokens 5,748 7,505
Reasoning Tokens 211,004 106,446
Response Time (avg) 40.57s 15.56s
Response Time (max) 556.06s 205.28s
Response Time (total) 892.57s 342.32s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#11 Qwen3.7 Max

medium
Cost
$0.017
Time
68.8s
Tokens
4,526 tok

#23 xAI: Grok 4.5

low
Cost
$0.011
Time
12.4s
Tokens
2,018 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.7 Max 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 35.31s 7,893 423 34,808
Grok 4.5 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 13.72s 9,579 303 15,641

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair