Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash vs inclusionAI: Ling-2.6-flash

Gemini 3.6 Flash (high) leads on average score with 9.7 vs 4.9. Ling-2.6-flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.002 vs $1.785. Ling-2.6-flash is faster at 10.68s vs 14.88s, with pass rates of 98.5% vs 30.3%.

Recommended modelGemini 3.6 Flash (high)It has the strongest score in this comparison (9.7) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Last updated at: 2026-07-21

Metric Gemini 3.6 Flash Gemini 3.6 Flash high Release: 2026-07-21 Ling-2.6-flash Ling-2.6-flash none Release: 2026-04-21
Score 9.7 4.9
Rank #2 #184
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.6 9.3
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 98.5% 30.3%
Flaky tests 1 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 8.497 0.024
Total Cost $1.785 $0.002
Input Price $1.500 / 1M $0.010 / 1M
Output Price $7.500 / 1M $0.030 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 87,819 114,375
Output Tokens 5,750 14,903
Reasoning Tokens 214,596 0
Response Time (avg) 14.88s 10.68s
Response Time (max) 88.00s 36.03s
Response Time (total) 327.37s 213.51s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#2 Gemini 3.6 Flash

high
Cost
$0.069
Time
44.0s
Tokens
9,251 tok

#184 Ling-2.6-flash

none
Ling-2.6-flash is no longer available as a free model. It has transitioned to a paid model. Continue using it here: https://openrouter.ai/inclusionai/ling-2.6-flash
Cost
$0.000
Time
0.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.6 Flash 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 26.73s 8,136 448 60,606
Ling-2.6-flash 5.3 10.0 33.3% 0 11.21s 813 381 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair