Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Qwen: Qwen3.7 Max

Qwen3.7 Max (medium) leads on average score with 9.2 vs 7.0. Gemini 3.5 Flash has the lower benchmark cost at $1.079 vs $1.116. Gemini 3.5 Flash is faster at 9.93s vs 40.57s, with pass rates of 74.2% vs 87.9%.

Recommended modelQwen3.7 Max (medium)It has the strongest score in this comparison (9.2) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Metric Gemini 3.5 Flash Gemini 3.5 Flash none Release: 2026-05-19 Qwen3.7 Max Qwen3.7 Max medium Release: 2026-05-22
Score 7.0 9.2
Rank #87 #13
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.9 9.3
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 74.2% 87.9%
Flaky tests 3 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 7.190 8.292
Total Cost $1.079 $1.116
Input Price $1.500 / 1M $1.475 / 1M
Output Price $9.000 / 1M $4.425 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 13,843 106,020
Output Tokens 117,518 5,748
Reasoning Tokens 0 211,004
Response Time (avg) 9.93s 40.57s
Response Time (max) 64.36s 556.06s
Response Time (total) 178.68s 892.57s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#87 Gemini 3.5 Flash

none
Cost
$0.225
Time
125.5s
Tokens
25,004 tok

#13 Qwen3.7 Max

medium
Cost
$0.017
Time
68.8s
Tokens
4,526 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash 8.8 7.8 88.9% 1 34.69s 8,122 75,927 0
Qwen3.7 Max 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 35.31s 7,893 423 34,808

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair