Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6

Kimi K2.6 (medium) leads on average score with 7.2 vs 7.0. Kimi K2.6 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $1.036 vs $1.079. Gemini 3.5 Flash is faster at 9.93s vs 109.98s, with pass rates of 74.2% vs 63.6%.

Recommended modelGemini 3.5 FlashIts score stays close to the best score here (7.0 vs 7.2), while responding about 11.1x faster than Kimi K2.6 (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-20

Metric Gemini 3.5 Flash Gemini 3.5 Flash none Release: 2026-05-19 Kimi K2.6 Kimi K2.6 medium Release: 2026-04-20
Score 7.0 7.2
Rank #79 #68
Reliability 10.0 9.4
Consistency 8.9 8.3
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 74.2% 63.6%
Flaky tests 3 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 7.190 9.821
Total Cost $1.079 $1.036
Input Price $1.500 / 1M $0.684 / 1M
Output Price $9.000 / 1M $3.420 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 13,843 68,902
Output Tokens 117,518 111,680
Reasoning Tokens 0 279,860
Response Time (avg) 9.93s 109.98s
Response Time (max) 64.36s 876.20s
Response Time (total) 178.68s 2309.56s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#79 Gemini 3.5 Flash

none
Cost
$0.225
Time
125.5s
Tokens
25,004 tok

#68 MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6

medium
Cost
$0.013
Time
103.4s
Tokens
3,620 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash 8.8 7.8 88.9% 1 34.69s 8,122 75,927 0
Kimi K2.6 5.7 8.6 33.3% 0 214.42s 2,925 9,970 77,189

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair