Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Meituan: LongCat 2.0

The average score is effectively tied at 6.7 vs 6.7. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.145 vs $0.391. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (low) is faster at 2.25s vs 100.31s, with pass rates of 66.7% vs 53.0%.

Recommended modelGemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (low)It has the best score here (6.7), while costing about 2.7x less than LongCat 2.0 (low).

Last updated at: 2026-07-21

Metric Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite low Release: 2026-07-21 LongCat 2.0 LongCat 2.0 low Release: 2026-07-20
Score 6.7 6.7
Rank #95 #96
Reliability 10.0 9.6
Consistency 8.2 8.9
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 66.7% 53.0%
Flaky tests 5 3
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 1.201 3.910
Total Cost $0.145 $0.391
Input Price $0.300 / 1M $0.300 / 1M
Output Price $2.500 / 1M $1.200 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 144,622 90,909
Output Tokens 15,302 5,679
Reasoning Tokens 24,971 297,369
Response Time (avg) 2.25s 100.31s
Response Time (max) 13.50s 560.39s
Response Time (total) 49.58s 2206.82s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#95 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

low
Cost
$0.008
Time
7.7s
Tokens
3,056 tok

#96 LongCat 2.0

low
Cost
$0.024
Time
428.0s
Tokens
19,557 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite 4.1 7.9 11.1% 1 672ms 8,136 463 0
LongCat 2.0 6.6 4.6 77.8% 2 479.30s 6,544 461 206,627

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair