#1 Gemini 3.5 Flash
high- Cost
- $0.208
- Time
- 118.2s
- Tokens
- 23,158 tok
AI BENCHY Compare
Summary
Gemini 3.5 Flash (high) leads on average score with 9.8 vs 7.1. Gemini 3.5 Flash (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $1.115 vs $1.148. Gemini 3.5 Flash (high) is faster at 8.84s vs 64.46s, with pass rates of 96.8% vs 63.5%.
Last updated at: 2026-07-14
| Metric | Gemini 3.5 Flash Gemini 3.5 Flash high | Step 3.7 Flash Step 3.7 Flash high |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 9.8 | 7.1 |
| Rank | #1 | #79 |
| Reliability | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Consistency | 9.6 | 8.2 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 96.8% | 63.5% |
| Flaky tests | 1 | 4 |
| Total Runs | 63 | 63 |
| Cost per result | 5.575 | 10.434 |
| Total Cost | $1.115 | $1.148 |
| Input Price | $1.500 / 1M | $0.200 / 1M |
| Output Price | $9.000 / 1M | $1.150 / 1M |
| Total Input Tokens | 37,594 | 38,391 |
| Output Tokens | 1,975 | 991,355 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 115,638 | 0 |
| Response Time (avg) | 8.84s | 64.46s |
| Response Time (max) | 34.82s | 364.99s |
| Response Time (total) | 185.57s | 1353.57s |
Generation showcase
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
| Coding | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 22.96s | 8,118 | 456 | 47,129 | |
| Step 3.7 Flash | 4.0 | 6.0 | 22.2% | 1 | 206.21s | 6,057 | 327,340 | 0 |
Switch Comparison Pair