Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Qwen3.7 Max vs Step 3.7 Flash (high)

Qwen3.7 Max leads on average score with 7.4 vs 6.9. Qwen3.7 Max has the lower benchmark cost at $0.197 vs $1.207. Qwen3.7 Max is faster at 4.52s vs 64.68s, with pass rates of 68.2% vs 63.6%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Rank
#67
Total Output Tokens
12,446
Response Time (avg)
4.52s
Total Cost
$0.197
Rank
#94
Total Output Tokens
1,032,395
Response Time (avg)
64.68s
Total Cost
$1.207
Recommended model Qwen3.7 Max

It has the best score here (7.4), while costing about 6.1x less than Step 3.7 Flash (high).

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.7 Max Qwen3.7 Max none Release: 2026-05-22 Step 3.7 Flash Step 3.7 Flash high Release: 2026-05-29
Score 7.4 6.9
Rank #67 #94
Reliability 9.9 10.0
Consistency 10.0 8.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 68.2% 63.6%
Flaky tests 0 5
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 1.582 10.973
Total Cost $0.197 $1.207
Input Price $1.475 / 1M $0.200 / 1M
Output Price $4.425 / 1M $1.150 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 95,983 98,691
Output Tokens 12,446 1,032,395
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 4.52s 64.68s
Response Time (max) 72.30s 364.99s
Response Time (total) 99.52s 1423.01s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#67 Qwen3.7 Max

none
Cost
$0.046
Time
195.0s
Tokens
12,171 tok

#94 Step 3.7 Flash

high
Cost
$0.007
Time
63.6s
Tokens
6,030 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.7 Max 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.35s 7,911 582 0
Step 3.7 Flash 4.0 6.0 22.2% 1 206.21s 6,057 327,340 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair