Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

AI BENCHY Compare

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash

Summary

Claude Sonnet 4.6 leads on average score with 7.3 vs 7.1. Claude Sonnet 4.6 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.316 vs $1.148. Claude Sonnet 4.6 is faster at 5.04s vs 64.46s, with pass rates of 55.6% vs 63.5%.

Recommended modelClaude Sonnet 4.6It has the best score here (7.3), while costing about 3.6x less than Step 3.7 Flash (high).

Last updated at: 2026-07-14

Metric Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 none Release: 2026-02-17 Step 3.7 Flash Step 3.7 Flash high Release: 2026-05-29
Score 7.3 7.1
Rank #71 #79
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.7 8.2
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 55.6% 63.5%
Flaky tests 1 4
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 2.870 10.434
Total Cost $0.316 $1.148
Input Price $3.000 / 1M $0.200 / 1M
Output Price $15.000 / 1M $1.150 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 57,886 38,391
Output Tokens 9,465 991,355
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 5.04s 64.46s
Response Time (max) 23.84s 364.99s
Response Time (total) 70.60s 1353.57s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#71 Claude Sonnet 4.6

none
Cost
$0.038
Time
27.3s
Tokens
2,598 tok

#79 Step 3.7 Flash

high
Cost
$0.007
Time
63.6s
Tokens
6,030 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Sonnet 4.6 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 5.19s 8,522 2,127 0
Step 3.7 Flash 4.0 6.0 22.2% 1 206.21s 6,057 327,340 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair