Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Meituan: LongCat 2.0

Gemini 3.5 Flash (high) leads on average score with 9.5 vs 6.3. LongCat 2.0 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.044 vs $1.976. LongCat 2.0 is faster at 5.18s vs 15.07s, with pass rates of 93.9% vs 36.4%.

Recommended modelGemini 3.5 Flash (high)It has the strongest score in this comparison (9.5) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Last updated at: 2026-07-20

Metric Gemini 3.5 Flash Gemini 3.5 Flash high Release: 2026-05-19 LongCat 2.0 LongCat 2.0 none Release: 2026-07-20
Score 9.5 6.3
Rank #2 #111
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.3 9.3
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 93.9% 36.4%
Flaky tests 2 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 9.879 0.627
Total Cost $1.976 $0.044
Input Price $1.500 / 1M $0.300 / 1M
Output Price $9.000 / 1M $1.200 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 107,137 108,743
Output Tokens 8,777 9,372
Reasoning Tokens 192,900 0
Response Time (avg) 15.07s 5.18s
Response Time (max) 145.92s 48.38s
Response Time (total) 331.48s 113.95s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#2 Gemini 3.5 Flash

high
Cost
$0.208
Time
118.2s
Tokens
23,158 tok

#111 LongCat 2.0

none
Cost
$0.027
Time
411.7s
Tokens
22,283 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 22.96s 8,118 456 47,129
LongCat 2.0 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 2.85s 7,446 578 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair