Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Meituan: LongCat 2.0

Gemini 3.5 Flash (high) leads on average score with 9.5 vs 6.7. LongCat 2.0 (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.391 vs $1.976. Gemini 3.5 Flash (high) is faster at 15.07s vs 100.31s, with pass rates of 93.9% vs 53.0%.

Recommended modelGemini 3.5 Flash (high)It has the best score here (9.5), while responding about 6.7x faster than LongCat 2.0 (low).

Last updated at: 2026-07-20

Metric Gemini 3.5 Flash Gemini 3.5 Flash high Release: 2026-05-19 LongCat 2.0 LongCat 2.0 low Release: 2026-07-20
Score 9.5 6.7
Rank #2 #91
Reliability 10.0 9.6
Consistency 9.3 8.9
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 93.9% 53.0%
Flaky tests 2 3
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 9.879 3.910
Total Cost $1.976 $0.391
Input Price $1.500 / 1M $0.300 / 1M
Output Price $9.000 / 1M $1.200 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 107,137 90,909
Output Tokens 8,777 5,679
Reasoning Tokens 192,900 297,369
Response Time (avg) 15.07s 100.31s
Response Time (max) 145.92s 560.39s
Response Time (total) 331.48s 2206.82s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#2 Gemini 3.5 Flash

high
Cost
$0.208
Time
118.2s
Tokens
23,158 tok

#91 LongCat 2.0

low
Cost
$0.024
Time
428.0s
Tokens
19,557 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 22.96s 8,118 456 47,129
LongCat 2.0 6.6 4.6 77.8% 2 479.30s 6,544 461 206,627

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair