Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

AI BENCHY Compare

Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 27B

Summary

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Qwen3.6 27B benchmark comparison: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads on average score with 6.4 vs 5.6. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has the lower benchmark cost at $0.013 vs $0.025. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is faster at 1.33s vs 3.72s, with pass rates of 54.0% vs 47.6%.

Recommended model: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite - It has the best score here (6.4), while costing about 1.9x less than Qwen3.6 27B.

Last updated at: 2026-06-10

Metric Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite minimal Release: 2026-05-08 Qwen3.6 27B Qwen3.6 27B none Release: 2026-04-20
Score 6.4 5.6
Rank #88 #119
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.8 7.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 54.0% 47.6%
Flaky tests 3 6
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 0.130 0.467
Total Cost $0.013 $0.025
Input Price $0.250 / 1M $0.290 / 1M
Output Price $1.500 / 1M $2.400 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 36,973 52,721
Output Tokens 2,487 3,812
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 1.33s 3.72s
Response Time (max) 4.49s 11.82s
Response Time (total) 27.91s 78.08s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#88 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite

minimal
Cost
$0.001
Time
3.7s
Tokens
635 tok

#119 Qwen3.6 27B

none
Cost
$0.009
Time
83.0s
Tokens
4,549 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Anti-AI Tricks Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite 8.3 10.0 75.0% 0 1.10s 500 639 0
Qwen3.6 27B 3.8 3.7 41.7% 3 2.83s 696 490 0
Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 831ms 8,126 666 0
Qwen3.6 27B 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 4.16s 7,913 539 0
Combined Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 2.53s 12,870 357 0
Qwen3.6 27B 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 9.95s 22,497 1,401 0
Data parsing and extraction Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 1.04s 7,552 279 0
Qwen3.6 27B 7.3 5.8 83.3% 1 2.06s 7,788 248 0
Domain specific Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite 2.9 7.2 11.1% 1 1.02s 641 15 0
Qwen3.6 27B 7.7 10.0 66.7% 0 3.03s 789 24 0
General Intelligence Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite 4.0 10.0 0.0% 0 791ms 490 63 0
Qwen3.6 27B 5.2 9.9 0.0% 0 1.07s 522 72 0
Instructions following Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 932ms 615 72 0
Qwen3.6 27B 6.2 5.8 66.7% 1 1.92s 711 49 0
Puzzle Solving Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite 6.0 4.6 66.7% 2 2.15s 564 153 0
Qwen3.6 27B 5.3 7.2 44.4% 1 5.15s 714 639 0
Tool Calling Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 3.51s 5,457 234 0
Qwen3.6 27B 9.5 10.0 100.0% 0 6.74s 10,881 339 0
Trivia Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 724ms 158 9 0
Qwen3.6 27B 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 4.03s 210 11 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair