Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs inclusionAI: Ring-2.6-1T

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (minimal) leads on average score with 6.1 vs 4.8. Ring-2.6-1T has the lower benchmark cost at $0.026 vs $0.047. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (minimal) is faster at 1.86s vs 55.10s, with pass rates of 51.5% vs 45.5%.

Recommended modelGemini 3.1 Flash Lite (minimal)It has the best score here (6.1), while responding about 29.7x faster than Ring-2.6-1T.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Metric Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite minimal Release: 2026-05-08 Ring-2.6-1T Ring-2.6-1T none Release: 2026-05-10
Score 6.1 4.8
Rank #131 #194
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.9 9.3
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 51.5% 45.5%
Flaky tests 3 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.465 0.000
Total Cost $0.047 $0.026
Input Price $0.250 / 1M $0.075 / 1M
Output Price $1.500 / 1M $0.625 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 119,065 7,599
Output Tokens 11,118 39,954
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 1.86s 55.10s
Response Time (max) 12.97s 143.82s
Response Time (total) 40.88s 881.55s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#131 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite

minimal
Cost
$0.001
Time
3.7s
Tokens
635 tok

#194 Ring-2.6-1T

none
Ring-2.6-1T is no longer available as a free model. It has transitioned to a paid model. Continue using it here: https://openrouter.ai/inclusionai/ring-2.6-1t
Cost
$0.000
Time
0.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 831ms 8,126 666 0
Ring-2.6-1T 5.3 10.0 33.3% 0 143.82s 834 5,036 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair