Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Google: Gemma 4 31B

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (low) leads on average score with 6.5 vs 6.3. Gemma 4 31B (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.116 vs $0.621. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (low) is faster at 16.26s vs 75.38s, with pass rates of 59.1% vs 68.2%.

Recommended modelGemma 4 31B (medium)Its score stays close to the best score here (6.3 vs 6.5), while costing about 5.4x less than Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (low).

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Metric Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite low Release: 2026-05-08 Gemma 4 31B Gemma 4 31B medium Release: 2026-04-02 Free Available
Score 6.5 6.3
Rank #115 #121
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.2 9.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 59.1% 68.2%
Flaky tests 2 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 5.170 1.044
Total Cost $0.621 $0.116
Input Price $0.250 / 1M $0.140 / 1M
Output Price $1.500 / 1M $0.400 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 94,224 94,992
Output Tokens 7,759 34,468
Reasoning Tokens 390,126 223,278
Response Time (avg) 16.26s 75.38s
Response Time (max) 318.02s 437.40s
Response Time (total) 357.64s 1507.52s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#115 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite

low
Cost
$0.003
Time
4.0s
Tokens
1,479 tok

#121 Gemma 4 31B

medium
Cost
$0.002
Time
45.7s
Tokens
2,696 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.53s 8,132 471 1,072
Gemma 4 31B 4.3 5.8 22.2% 1 219.76s 5,568 11,098 33,212

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair