Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Flash leads on average score with 6.2 vs 6.1. Gemini 2.5 Flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.017 vs $0.062. Qwen3.6 Flash is faster at 3.74s vs 6.20s, with pass rates of 43.9% vs 34.9%.

Recommended modelGemini 2.5 FlashIt has the best score here (6.2), while costing about 3.7x less than Qwen3.6 Flash.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Metric Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash none Release: 2025-06-17 Qwen3.6 Flash Qwen3.6 Flash none Release: 2026-04-20
Score 6.2 6.1
Rank #129 #135
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.6 9.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 43.9% 34.9%
Flaky tests 1 1
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.186 0.935
Total Cost $0.017 $0.062
Input Price $0.300 / 1M $0.188 / 1M
Output Price $2.500 / 1M $1.125 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 39,877 139,788
Output Tokens 1,890 30,947
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 6.20s 3.74s
Response Time (max) 118.00s 48.79s
Response Time (total) 136.37s 82.38s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#129 Gemini 2.5 Flash

none
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.164
Time
215.5s
Tokens
65,659 tok

#135 Qwen3.6 Flash

none
Cost
$0.005
Time
20.1s
Tokens
4,211 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 2.5 Flash 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 736ms 8,122 483 0
Qwen3.6 Flash 5.4 10.0 33.3% 0 1.79s 6,488 889 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair