Navigate
Advertise here

Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Qwen3.6 Flash

Qwen3.6 Flash leads on average score with 6.1 vs 6.0. Gemini 2.5 Flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.017 vs $0.062. Qwen3.6 Flash is faster at 3.73s vs 6.19s, with pass rates of 39.4% vs 34.9%.

Last updated at: 2026-09-08

Compared models

Rank
#205
Total Output Tokens
1,890
Response Time (avg)
6.19s
Total Cost
$0.017
Rank
#200
Total Output Tokens
30,947
Response Time (avg)
3.73s
Total Cost
$0.062
Recommended model Qwen3.6 Flash

It has the best score here (6.1), while responding about 1.7x faster than Gemini 2.5 Flash.

Detailed comparison

Metric Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash none Release: 2025-06-17 Qwen3.6 Flash Qwen3.6 Flash none Release: 2026-04-20
Score 6.0 6.1
Rank #205 #200
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.6 9.6
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 39.4% 34.9%
Flaky tests 1 1
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.209 0.935
Total Cost $0.017 $0.062
Input Price $0.300 / 1M $0.188 / 1M
Output Price $2.500 / 1M $1.125 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 39,886 139,797
Output Tokens 1,890 30,947
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 6.19s 3.73s
Response Time (max) 118.00s 48.79s
Response Time (total) 136.23s 81.95s
Parameters ~350B total (~20B active) ~35B total (~3B active)
Availability Closed Closed

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#205 Gemini 2.5 Flash

none
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.164
Time
215.5s
Tokens
65,659 tok

#200 Qwen3.6 Flash

none
Cost
$0.005
Time
20.1s
Tokens
4,211 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 2.5 Flash 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 736ms 8,122 483 0
Qwen3.6 Flash 5.4 10.0 33.3% 0 1.79s 6,488 889 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair