Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

AI BENCHY Compare

Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B

Summary

Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B benchmark comparison: Qwen3.6 35B A3B leads on average score with 6.7 vs 6.2. Gemini 2.5 Flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.016 vs $0.146. Gemini 2.5 Flash is faster at 875ms vs 18.08s, with pass rates of 46.0% vs 63.5%.

Recommended model: Gemini 2.5 Flash - Its score stays close to the best score here (6.2 vs 6.7), while costing about 9.6x less than Qwen3.6 35B A3B.

Last updated at: 2026-06-18

Metric Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash none Release: 2025-06-17 Qwen3.6 35B A3B Qwen3.6 35B A3B medium Release: 2026-04-20
Score 6.2 6.7
Rank #93 #75
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.6 9.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 46.0% 63.5%
Flaky tests 1 1
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 0.169 1.094
Total Cost $0.016 $0.146
Input Price $0.300 / 1M $0.140 / 1M
Output Price $2.500 / 1M $1.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 35,926 16,385
Output Tokens 1,770 19,632
Reasoning Tokens 0 130,219
Response Time (avg) 875ms 18.08s
Response Time (max) 4.39s 86.11s
Response Time (total) 18.37s 343.61s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#93 Gemini 2.5 Flash

none
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.164
Time
215.5s
Tokens
65,659 tok

#75 Qwen3.6 35B A3B

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Anti-AI Tricks Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 2.5 Flash 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 582ms 492 102 0
Qwen3.6 35B A3B 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 6.02s 672 1,154 12,385
Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 2.5 Flash 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 736ms 8,122 483 0
Qwen3.6 35B A3B 7.7 10.0 66.7% 0 50.55s 5,051 7,929 37,223
Combined Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 2.5 Flash 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 4.39s 12,519 366 0
Qwen3.6 35B A3B 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 0ms 0 0 0
Data parsing and extraction Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 2.5 Flash 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 652ms 7,257 279 0
Qwen3.6 35B A3B 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 12.99s 7,776 2,591 9,968
Domain specific Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 2.5 Flash 5.9 7.2 55.6% 1 495ms 633 12 0
Qwen3.6 35B A3B 5.3 7.2 44.4% 1 22.50s 771 6,193 39,116
General Intelligence Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 2.5 Flash 5.0 10.0 0.0% 0 615ms 486 78 0
Qwen3.6 35B A3B 4.4 9.9 0.0% 0 8.66s 516 129 4,569
Instructions following Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 2.5 Flash 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 590ms 615 72 0
Qwen3.6 35B A3B 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 7.50s 699 219 7,404
Puzzle Solving Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 2.5 Flash 7.7 10.0 66.7% 0 604ms 558 132 0
Qwen3.6 35B A3B 8.0 10.0 66.7% 0 5.95s 696 655 9,228
Tool Calling Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 2.5 Flash 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 1.91s 5,088 234 0
Qwen3.6 35B A3B 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 0ms 0 0 0
Trivia Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 2.5 Flash 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 1.15s 156 12 0
Qwen3.6 35B A3B 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 32.90s 204 762 10,326

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair