Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 27B

The average score is effectively tied at 5.6 vs 5.5. DeepSeek V4 Flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.044 vs $0.087. Qwen3.6 27B is faster at 10.65s vs 36.78s, with pass rates of 31.8% vs 45.5%.

Recommended modelQwen3.6 27BIt has the best score here (5.5), while responding about 3.5x faster than DeepSeek V4 Flash.

Last updated at: 2026-07-22

Metric DeepSeek V4 Flash DeepSeek V4 Flash none Release: 2026-04-24 Qwen3.6 27B Qwen3.6 27B none Release: 2026-04-20
Score 5.6 5.5
Rank #156 #158
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.5 7.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 31.8% 45.5%
Flaky tests 4 6
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.917 1.220
Total Cost $0.044 $0.087
Input Price $0.098 / 1M $0.450 / 1M
Output Price $0.196 / 1M $2.700 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 240,221 95,796
Output Tokens 100,727 16,155
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 36.78s 10.65s
Response Time (max) 247.27s 156.31s
Response Time (total) 809.09s 234.39s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#156 DeepSeek V4 Flash

none
Cost
$0.004
Time
157.6s
Tokens
11,297 tok

#158 Qwen3.6 27B

none
Cost
$0.009
Time
83.0s
Tokens
4,549 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
DeepSeek V4 Flash 4.2 7.4 11.1% 1 17.13s 7,279 9,717 0
Qwen3.6 27B 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 4.16s 7,913 539 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair