Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

AI BENCHY Compare

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.1

Summary

GLM 5.1 leads on average score with 5.5 vs 5.0. DeepSeek V3.2 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.054 vs $0.164. GLM 5.1 is faster at 6.70s vs 18.25s, with pass rates of 37.9% vs 40.9%.

Recommended modelGLM 5.1It has the best score here (5.5), while responding about 2.7x faster than DeepSeek V3.2.

Last updated at: 2026-07-17

Metric DeepSeek V3.2 DeepSeek V3.2 none Release: 2025-12-01 GLM 5.1 GLM 5.1 none Release: 2026-04-07
Score 5.0 5.5
Rank #165 #144
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.7 8.2
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 37.9% 40.9%
Flaky tests 6 5
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.870 2.368
Total Cost $0.054 $0.164
Input Price $0.269 / 1M $0.966 / 1M
Output Price $0.400 / 1M $3.036 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 135,780 124,209
Output Tokens 42,097 14,393
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 18.25s 6.70s
Response Time (max) 115.89s 61.20s
Response Time (total) 401.60s 147.38s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#165 DeepSeek V3.2

none
Cost
$0.002
Time
7.0s
Tokens
1,046 tok

#144 GLM 5.1

none
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
DeepSeek V3.2 3.1 6.9 11.1% 1 14.54s 7,279 4,528 0
GLM 5.1 3.9 9.7 0.0% 0 4.96s 7,256 525 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair