Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 vs MiniMax: MiniMax M2.5

DeepSeek V3.2 leads on average score with 5.0 vs 4.6. DeepSeek V3.2 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.054 vs $0.340. DeepSeek V3.2 is faster at 18.25s vs 68.27s, with pass rates of 37.9% vs 45.5%.

Recommended modelDeepSeek V3.2It has the best score here (5.0), while costing about 6.4x less than MiniMax M2.5 (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-17

Metric DeepSeek V3.2 DeepSeek V3.2 none Release: 2025-12-01 MiniMax M2.5 MiniMax M2.5 medium Release: 2026-02-12
Score 5.0 4.6
Rank #165 #182
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.7 6.2
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 37.9% 45.5%
Flaky tests 6 10
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.870 8.648
Total Cost $0.054 $0.340
Input Price $0.269 / 1M $0.150 / 1M
Output Price $0.400 / 1M $0.900 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 135,780 142,561
Output Tokens 42,097 125,442
Reasoning Tokens 0 339,935
Response Time (avg) 18.25s 68.27s
Response Time (max) 115.89s 251.36s
Response Time (total) 401.60s 955.75s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#165 DeepSeek V3.2

none
Cost
$0.002
Time
7.0s
Tokens
1,046 tok

#182 MiniMax M2.5

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
DeepSeek V3.2 3.1 6.9 11.1% 1 14.54s 7,279 4,528 0
MiniMax M2.5 3.4 9.1 0.0% 0 188.58s 6,076 357 106,177

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair