Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

DeepSeek V3.2 (medium) vs Qwen3.7 Flash (medium)

DeepSeek V3.2 (medium) leads on average score with 7.0 vs 7.0. Qwen3.7 Flash (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.064 vs $0.078. Qwen3.7 Flash (medium) is faster at 45.90s vs 68.62s, with pass rates of 65.2% vs 65.2%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-28

Rank
#86
Total Output Tokens
128,848
Response Time (avg)
68.62s
Total Cost
$0.078
Rank
#91
Total Output Tokens
462,623
Response Time (avg)
45.90s
Total Cost
$0.064
Recommended model Qwen3.7 Flash (medium)

It offers the best overall trade-off: a competitive score (7.0), lower cost than DeepSeek V3.2 (medium), and balanced response time.

Detailed comparison

Metric DeepSeek V3.2 DeepSeek V3.2 medium Release: 2025-12-01 Qwen3.7 Flash Qwen3.7 Flash medium Release: 2026-07-28
Score 7.0 7.0
Rank #86 #91
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.4 7.5
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 65.2% 65.2%
Flaky tests 7 7
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.671 0.636
Total Cost $0.078 $0.064
Input Price $0.269 / 1M $0.030 / 1M
Output Price $0.400 / 1M $0.130 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 101,047 114,468
Output Tokens 11,834 12,786
Reasoning Tokens 117,014 449,837
Response Time (avg) 68.62s 45.90s
Response Time (max) 376.10s 593.64s
Response Time (total) 1509.53s 1009.84s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#86 DeepSeek V3.2

medium
Cost
$0.001
Time
53.6s
Tokens
1,932 tok

#91 Qwen3.7 Flash

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
600.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
DeepSeek V3.2 6.0 7.2 55.6% 1 248.68s 5,717 649 52,014
Qwen3.7 Flash 6.2 6.9 55.6% 1 46.78s 7,893 563 61,902

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair