Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

AI BENCHY Compare

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash

Summary

DeepSeek V3.2 (medium) leads on average score with 7.0 vs 6.8. DeepSeek V3.2 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.078 vs $0.300. Gemini 3.5 Flash (minimal) is faster at 2.65s vs 68.62s, with pass rates of 65.2% vs 65.2%.

Recommended modelDeepSeek V3.2 (medium)It has the best score here (7.0), while costing about 3.9x less than Gemini 3.5 Flash (minimal).

Last updated at: 2026-07-17

Metric DeepSeek V3.2 DeepSeek V3.2 medium Release: 2025-12-01 Gemini 3.5 Flash Gemini 3.5 Flash minimal Release: 2026-05-19
Score 7.0 6.8
Rank #73 #85
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.4 9.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 65.2% 65.2%
Flaky tests 7 1
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.671 2.138
Total Cost $0.078 $0.300
Input Price $0.269 / 1M $1.500 / 1M
Output Price $0.400 / 1M $9.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 101,047 100,753
Output Tokens 11,834 16,454
Reasoning Tokens 117,014 0
Response Time (avg) 68.62s 2.65s
Response Time (max) 376.10s 25.26s
Response Time (total) 1509.53s 58.27s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#73 DeepSeek V3.2

medium
Cost
$0.001
Time
53.6s
Tokens
1,932 tok

#85 Gemini 3.5 Flash

minimal
Cost
$0.041
Time
20.4s
Tokens
4,608 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
DeepSeek V3.2 6.0 7.2 55.6% 1 248.68s 5,717 649 52,014
Gemini 3.5 Flash 5.6 9.9 33.3% 0 2.75s 8,122 3,456 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair