Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Lite vs Google: Gemma 4 31B

The average score is effectively tied at 6.2 vs 6.2. Gemma 4 31B has the lower benchmark cost at $0.023 vs $0.066. Seed-2.0-Lite is faster at 4.40s vs 5.34s, with pass rates of 43.9% vs 48.5%.

Recommended modelGemma 4 31BIt has the best score here (6.2), while costing about 2.8x less than Seed-2.0-Lite.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Metric Seed-2.0-Lite Seed-2.0-Lite none Release: 2026-02-14 Gemma 4 31B Gemma 4 31B none Release: 2026-04-02 Free Available
Score 6.2 6.2
Rank #127 #126
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.5 9.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 43.9% 48.5%
Flaky tests 4 1
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.814 0.330
Total Cost $0.066 $0.023
Input Price $0.250 / 1M $0.140 / 1M
Output Price $2.000 / 1M $0.400 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 142,197 125,728
Output Tokens 14,746 13,317
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 4.40s 5.34s
Response Time (max) 44.58s 29.95s
Response Time (total) 96.84s 106.82s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#127 Seed-2.0-Lite

none
Cost
$0.005
Time
83.8s
Tokens
2,311 tok

#126 Gemma 4 31B

none
Cost
$0.001
Time
12.8s
Tokens
795 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Seed-2.0-Lite 5.6 10.0 33.3% 0 2.83s 8,215 410 0
Gemma 4 31B 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 11.19s 8,381 735 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair