Navigate
Advertise here

Cobuddy (medium) vs Laguna S 2.1 (low)

Laguna S 2.1 (low) leads on average score with 4.6 vs 4.4. Cobuddy (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.000 vs $0.109. Cobuddy (medium) is faster at 38.01s vs 88.24s, with pass rates of 43.5% vs 23.2%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-01

Compared models

Rank
#337
Total Output Tokens
118,380
Response Time (avg)
38.01s
Total Cost
$0.000
Rank
#324
Total Output Tokens
495,517
Response Time (avg)
88.24s
Total Cost
$0.109
Recommended model Laguna S 2.1 (low)

It has the strongest score in this comparison (4.6) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Detailed comparison

Metric Cobuddy Cobuddy medium Release: 2026-05-06 Free Available Laguna S 2.1 Laguna S 2.1 low Release: 2026-07-21 Free Available
Score 4.4 4.6
Rank #337 #324
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.3 7.8
Attempts 66/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 43.5% 23.2%
Flaky tests 6 6
Total Runs 66 69
Cost per result 0.000 3.627
Total Cost $0.000 $0.109
Input Price $0.000 / 1M $0.090 / 1M
Output Price $0.000 / 1M $0.180 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 37,449 232,641
Output Tokens 1,677 69,335
Reasoning Tokens 116,703 426,182
Response Time (avg) 38.01s 88.24s
Response Time (max) 309.02s 814.73s
Response Time (total) 798.15s 2029.57s
Parameters ~21B total (~3B active) 118B total (8B active)
Availability Closed Weights available

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#337 Cobuddy

medium
No endpoints found for baidu/cobuddy:free.
Cost
$0.000
Time
0.1s
Tokens
0 tok

#324 Laguna S 2.1

low
Cost
$0.001
Time
6.6s
Tokens
1,314 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 3.7 6.7 22.2% 1 79.17s 4,726 358 30,138
Laguna S 2.1 3.8 7.1 22.2% 1 167.51s 7,917 58,111 119,138

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair